top of page

News

Search

The Condominium Act (Chapter 398 of the Laws of Malta) is the primary law that regulates how condominiums are administered.


What is a Condominium?

The law defines a condominium as a building or group of buildings where two or more people jointly own, use, or enjoy certain shared areas, called “common parts,” while each person separately owns their individual unit within the same building or complex.


In practical terms, the most common form of a condominium is a block of apartments, where each unit (flat) is individually owned, yet the common parts are co-owned by all the individual owners (collectively referred to as the condomini) in undivided shares.


The undivided shares in the common parts are presumed to be equally distributed among the condomini. For instance, in a block comprising five apartments, each apartment owner is presumed to hold a one-fifth (1/5) share in the common parts, unless otherwise stated in the contracts of sale.


Which are the “Common Parts”?

While most contracts of sale nowadays clearly list which areas of the block are to be considered common, the Condominium Act provides a non-exhaustive list of what is presumed to be a common part, unless otherwise stated in the deed of sale. These include:


  • The land upon which the building or complex is constructed

  • The foundations and external walls, including any common dividing walls with neighbouring properties

  • The roof, airspace, and shafts

  • The entrance doors, staircases, stairwells, corridors, and lobbies

  • Any courtyards, common gardens, or shared open spaces

  • Lifts, wells, cisterns, drainage pipes, all  installations  for  water,  gas,  electricity, heating  and  similar  services  up  to  where  the  said installations branch off exclusively to serve an individual unit

  • And generally, any other part of the property that is intended for shared use or enjoyment.


If a contract of sale expressly excludes certain parts from the common parts, or defines the common parts differently, such contractual provisions prevail over the law. It is common, for example, for the roof and airspace to be kept in private ownership and therefore be excluded from the common parts.


When to Appoint an Administrator?

If there are up to three unit owners, they may administer the condominium jointly or appoint an administrator. If there are more than three unit owners, the condomini must appoint an administrator. The administrator must be appointed during a meeting held between the same condomini and such administrator shall hold office for a period of two years unless otherwise agreed.


After appointing an administrator, the condominium must be registered with the Land Registry Agency. The administrator then serves as the legal representative of the condominium, authorised to handle all matters related to the common areas, including taking legal action, for example, to collect unpaid contributions from individual unit owners.


Among the key responsibilities of the administrator are handling the maintenance and repairs of the common parts, maintaining financial records, keeping a register of all condomini, managing the condominium’s funds, holding general meetings, and recording minutes of those meetings.


What is a General Meeting?

A general meeting includes all unit owners, and a quorum is required for this kind of meeting to proceed. This quorum requires the presence of condomini representing at least two-thirds (2/3) of all units.


If a quorum is not reached within thirty minutes of the scheduled start time, the meeting will be adjourned and reconvened either on the same day the following week at the same time and place, or on a different date, time, and location as specified in the notice by the administrator. Should a quorum still not be present within thirty minutes at the reconvened meeting, the present condomini at that meeting will be considered to constitute a valid quorum.


Decisions such as those which alter the aesthetics of the condominium or involve serious alterations to the common parts, require the unanimous consent of all condomini. Others, like carrying out other alterations to common parts, setting or amending condominium rules, require at least a 2/3 vote of units represented at the meeting. Decisions outside these critical categories, such as agreeing upon the cleaning services of the common parts, may be passed by simple majority.


The Crucial Role of General Meetings

During the general meetings, important decisions regarding the common areas may be made. These meetings hold wide-ranging powers, including but not limited to appointing or confirming the administrator and setting their fee, approving the annual expenditure budget and the administrator's accounts, and deciding on extraordinary repairs. Topics such as the installation of a lift, the allocation of its costs, structural façade works, and other related matters may also be discussed and voted upon.


Apportionment of Costs

The law states that the costs for the upkeep and repair of common areas are generally shared amongst the condomini based on the value of each unit, unless otherwise agreed. In practice, it is commonly agreed that costs are shared equally between the units. If certain parts benefit co-owners unequally, expenses are divided according to the extent of use each condominus can make of them. For areas like staircases, courtyards, or roofs that serve only part of the building, maintenance costs are to be borne solely by the benefiting parties.


A condominus may be exempted from contributing to certain expenses particularly if one does not intend to benefit from the alterations and/or innovations that allow for separate use. However, this exemption is not always straightforward or easily applied. The right to opt out is limited to cases where the changes are purely decorative in nature, or where the associated costs are excessively onerous, especially in light of the particular condition and prestige of the condominium.


Given that this exemption is subject to interpretation, it often gives rise to disputes. What qualifies as "excessively onerous" or "decorative" may differ. Additionally, even if a condominus claims no intention of using or benefiting from the innovation, the enhancement may still indirectly improve the overall value or appeal of the building, potentially benefiting all units regardless of direct use.


Therefore, the decision to contribute or not is rarely black and white, and legal guidance may be necessary to resolve disagreements and ensure a more harmonious condominium environment.


If you are looking to buy or sell a property, the first step to formalise an agreement is to enter into a promise of sale (konvenju). This article will explain some of the main items one needs to be aware of before signing a promise of sale and during the period of validity of the promise of sale.


A promise of sale is a binding agreement whereby the buyer and seller undertake to enter into an actual deed of sale between themselves. A promise of sale is normally done in front of a Notary Public, and in order to be valid, it must be in writing, fulfill certain requirements and be registered with the Inland Revenue Department.


A simple verbal agreement between a buyer and seller, or a written agreement which does not fulfill the legal requirements, does not constitute a promise of sale and would not be legally enforceable. Either party would be free to change their mind about buying or selling, or about the terms and conditions.


Although the promise of sale is not the final deed of transfer, it is arguably more important than the actual transfer. This is due to the fact that the promise of sale is legally binding, and the terms and conditions agreed upon in the promise of sale cannot be changed on the final deed (unless both buyer and seller agree). The seller cannot, for example, unilaterally decide to raise the price of the property after signing the promise of sale, just because he forgot to consider the agency fee or taxes payable.


Some conditions to consider and be aware of when entering into a promise of sale are:

  1. Whether the deposit is left with Notary or given directly to the sellers (or released in favour of the sellers upon the fulfillment of certain conditions)

  2. Customarily, the deposit is given on account of the price. However, it may also be given as earnest (kapparra). In this latter case, the promise of sale is not enforceable, and therefore either party may back out of the promise of sale subject to forfeiture of the kapparra.

  3. Whether the property is freehold or subject to a groundrent (whether a temporary or perpetual groundrent)

  4. The description of the property, what rights it enjoys and whether it is subject to any burdens or constraints

  5. Whether the property is built according to permit

  6. Whether the property is being sold as is and with all guarantees according to law, and whether movables are also part of the sale


These are just some of the clauses that may need to be considered and may have important repercussions on the promise of sale and eventual final deed, for both the buyer and the seller.


By way of example, if the property is subject to a groundrent which needs to be redeemed in order to render the property freehold, but on the promise of sale the property is erroneously described as being freehold, the seller would be obliged to pay for this redemption in order to sell according to the conditions agreed in the promise of sale. However, if the property was correctly described in the promise of sale as being subject to the groundrent, the buyer would have to buy the property as subject to the groundrent or else to redeem at his expense.


Any conditions to which the promise of sale is subject, must be clearly disclosed in the promise of sale. Thus for example, if the buyer requires a bank loan in order to acquire or wants to acquire subject to obtaining a planning permit, these conditions must be stated. Conditions may also be included in favour of the seller, for example when the sale is subject to obtaining court authorisation for the sale. If such conditions are not stated in the promise of sale, then the parties cannot rely on them. Therefore if, for instance, the promise of sale is not subject to the buyer obtaining a bank loan, the buyer cannot then back out of the sale citing failure to obtain a bank loan.


The promise of sale will have a stated period of validity. A promise of sale is only valid and enforceable during its period of validity. Any action to either enforce the promise of sale (that is, to force the other party to appear on the final deed of sale) or to terminate the promise of sale due to the fault of the other party, must be taken prior to the expiry of the promise of sale. This action must be taken through court – normally a judicial letter is first sent, which has the legal effect of extending the promise of sale by 30 days, and then this would be followed up with a court case.


If a promise of sale is left to expire without taking judicial (court) action, the promise of sale simply falls through and loses its effect. The result is that the parties return to the ‘status quo ante’, and the deposit would be refundable to the buyer.


When buying or selling a property, legal advice may be required at all stages, even before marketing a property or negotiating the transfer. However, the promise of sale is the main starting point since it sets out the binding parameters for the eventual sale and therefore may significantly limit or broaden the eventual legal actions that may be taken in relation to the sale.


For any business, collecting outstanding payments is a priority. However, many businesses often find themselves unsure of where to start with debt recovery, leading them to abandon the process. Yet, in some cases, writing off bad debts is not an option, and so they must be effectively addressed.


A good starting point to successful debt recovery is often an out-of-court settlement. This typically involves sending a legal letter— a formal demand for payment on the law firm's letterhead demanding that the debtor pay the outstanding amount within a specified timeframe. This letter can be sent by the firm by regular mail, registered post, or even e-mail.

Although a legal letter can often resolve the matter, this is not always the case. When this happens, the business could proceed with a judicial letter which is a letter sent through court. In certain situations, it is recommended that the creditor immediately opts for this option particularly when the prescriptive period is about to lapse.


When the debt is liquid, certain and due, the business may choose to file a judicial letter under Article 166A of Chapter 12 of the Laws of Malta rather than a normal judicial letter, as this type of letter 166A can be particularly effective. When the debtor receives such a judicial letter and does not contest the claim within thirty (30) days of receipt, the judicial letter becomes an executive title. This means that the judicial letter would have obtained the force of a judgement and that the business can take judicial action to enforce the claim.


If the debt is uncertain, contested, or not liquid and due and the debtor remains in default, the business will need to open a court case to have the debt liquidated and determined by the court.

In addition to submitting a judicial letter or opening a court case, the business may also consider filing precautionary measures, such as a precautionary garnishee order (‘mandat ta' sekwestru kawtelatorju’). This precautionary warrant helps protect the creditor from the risk of the debtor disposing of all his assets. Once acceded to, the court orders the commercial banks along with any other garnishees named in the warrant, which hold assets in the debtor’s name, to freeze an amount equal to the debt due and deposit it under the court’s authority for safekeeping. This garnishee order can also be used as an executive measure, allowing the creditor to claim and withdraw the frozen amount once a judgement is given in the business’ favour or a 166A judicial letter becomes executive.


Other precautionary warrants include a warrant of seizure, which allows the court to seize the debtor’s assets and the warrant of prohibitory injunction, which prevents the debtor from transferring or disposing his assets. These provide an additional layer of protection for creditors seeking to secure the recovery of debts.


Businesses should also be aware of the prescriptive period of their claim. The prescriptive period is the deadline set out in the law within which judicial action must be taken. The period depends on the type of claim being made. Failure to take action within that deadline could mean that the business loses its right to claim the amount due. It is therefore important for businesses to be aware of the applicable prescriptive period and to take judicial action before expiry of that period.


In order to facilitate debt collection it is also important to have good client on-boarding procedures, such as gathering relevant data of the client and signing agreements if needed. Debt collection can be a complex and time-consuming process, but with the right legal strategy, businesses can protect their interests and recover owed debts efficiently. If your business is facing challenges with outstanding debts, our firm is here to assist you and help you find the best legal route for your situation.


bottom of page